منابع مشابه
Usability Evaluation of Ontology Editors
Ontology editors are software tools that allow the creation and maintenance of ontologies through a graphical user interface. As the Semantic Web effort grows, a larger community of users for this kind of tools is expected. New users include people not specifically skilled in the use of ontology formalisms. In consequence, the usability of ontology editors can be viewed as a key adoption precon...
متن کاملOntology Evolution within Ontology Editors
An ontology over a period of time needs to be modified to reflect changes in the real world, changes in the user’s requirements, drawbacks in the initial design, to incorporate additional functionality or to allow for incremental improvement. Although changes are inevitable during the development and deployment of an ontology, most of the current ontology editors unfortunately do not provide en...
متن کاملCriteria and Evaluation for Ontology Modularization Techniques
While many authors have argued for the benefits of applying principles of modularization to ontologies, there is not yet a common understanding of how modules are defined and what properties they should have. In the previous section, this question was addressed from a purely logical point of view. In this chapter, we take a broader view on possible criteria that can be used to determine the qua...
متن کاملComparison Some of Ontology Editors
In this paper some software tools related to Semantic web are considered and compared. In fact, five ontology-editors are described and compared. They are: Apollo, OntoStudio, Protégé, Swoop and TopBraid Composer Free Edition. The structure and basic features of these editors are described, as well as the way of their using. The main criterion for comparison of these editors was the convenience...
متن کاملOntology Based Model of the Common Criteria Evaluation Evidences
The paper presents a new ontology-based approach to the elaboration and management of evidences prepared by developers for the IT security evaluation process according to the Common Criteria standard. The evidences concern the claimed EAL (Evaluation Assurance Level) for a developed IT product or system, called TOE (Target of Evaluation), and depend on the TOE features and its development envir...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Problemy Zarzadzania
سال: 2015
ISSN: 1644-9584
DOI: 10.7172/1644-9584.52.6